REVILING CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALISM

In every era, some group must be especially singled out for hatred and ridicule. Some group must serve as the butt of our jokes. Some group must be blamed for our troubles. Some group must be identified as the enemy of the state. In this era, that group is Christian Fundamentalists. A Personal Story I …

Continue reading REVILING CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALISM

A Dialogue: The Trustworthiness of Sacred Scripture

The dialogue here is an exchange between myself and Fr. Casey, who is a Catholic personality with a Youtube Channel called "Breaking in the Habit." As many of the readers here know, as a trained historian, I thought the video was a generalized view on the historicity of the Exodus with dated talking points on …

Continue reading A Dialogue: The Trustworthiness of Sacred Scripture

Hebron—A Tale of Biblical Scholarship and Archaeology

It’s no surprise that if there are no rocks that have been dug up then modernity’s skeptical approach wants to relegate Biblical narratives as a myth. The one aspect that needs to be stressed from an academic bias is that there is no unbiased scholarship—none; it doesn’t exist. For example, many skeptics will put forth …

Continue reading Hebron—A Tale of Biblical Scholarship and Archaeology

What Happens When Youtube Theologians Make Historic claims?

I'm curious when clerics or theologians make authoritative historical arguments what exactly are their credentials to make these historic claims? Perhaps, Fr. Casey has a degree in History; however, by the video, his presentation appears second hand. Fr. Casey even presents the 600,000 men argument against the Exodus narrative, which as someone trained as a …

Continue reading What Happens When Youtube Theologians Make Historic claims?

Considering St. Robert Bellarmine’s De Controversiis Part 2

In the last post of this series—part 1—it was discussed the historical disagreement of Thomas Paine, one of the founding fathers of the United States, arguing in his esteemed work Common Sense that theologically the ‘anti-monarchical’ passages of scripture had never been addressed—especially by those who supported monarchy as the best form of government. As …

Continue reading Considering St. Robert Bellarmine’s De Controversiis Part 2

THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON BIBLICAL INERRANCY

What is this post about? It is about the argument between those who use the expression "biblical inerrancy" and those use the expression "biblical literalism". Those who say we can trust the Bible use the expression "biblical inerrancy". Those who say we cannot trust the Bible use the expression "biblical literalism". Oddly, Bing and Google …

Continue reading THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON BIBLICAL INERRANCY

Thomas Paine, John Calvin, St. Robert Bellarmine and Forms of Government–Part 1

Common Sense is Thomas Paine’s great work in which he argued for the America Colonies' rejection of the rule of England’s monarchy and the rule of King George III. Paine famously argues by a commentary used for political means that 1 Samuel 8 is a rejection of Monarchy writing: “As the exalting one man so …

Continue reading Thomas Paine, John Calvin, St. Robert Bellarmine and Forms of Government–Part 1

STRENGTH LIES IN DIFFERENCES, NOT IN SIMILARITIES

Strength lies in differences, not in similarities. — Stephen R. Covey, The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People (from here (medium.com)) We live in a republic that is slowly dying. Why? We don't learn -- we don't teach our children -- how to be the citizens of a republic. We teach our children about their rights, …

Continue reading STRENGTH LIES IN DIFFERENCES, NOT IN SIMILARITIES